Welcome to Manufacturing Minute!
I'm glad you're here.
Let's get to it.
But first, a word about doing more with less:
Are you stuck missing the production targets from 2 years ago while your budget hasn’t adjusted since COVID?
Most plant managers are sitting on 15-30% (maybe even 50%) untapped capacity, they just don't know where to look. At Axiom, we help you find it without buying new equipment, hiring more people, or waiting for next year's capital budget.
Ready to unlock what you already have?
🚨One move worth re-reading
Dow named Karen Carter as its next CEO last week.
She takes over from Jim Fitterling on July 1.
She's a thirty-year Dow veteran and the current COO, which puts this squarely in what I'd call the highest-persistence kind of transition: internal, operations-side, long-tenure.
When you backtest roughly two thousand senior industrial leadership changes, that profile is the one where you can most reliably predict the company will not change its operating behavior in the first ninety days after the handoff.
Culture eats leadership.
The shape of a business doesn't move because the person at the top does and usually not in one quarter (or 2).
So what I'll be watching is the next three senior hires below Karen, because that's where the new CEO's rolodex shows up.
A board hire almost never moves the business in ninety days.
It always moves the rolodex.
And if Dow is about to do the thing you'd imagine a long-tenure operations CEO would do (rebuild the operating bench) the names that come in over the next sixty days will tell you more than the press release did.
🏭 One structural thing that's been bugging me.
The backtest I keep coming back to this month:
Of all the companies classified as constrained, meaning a real operating bottleneck is binding on the business… only about 2% transition to a healthier operating posture within a quarter of a new CEO arriving.
That's ninety-eight out of a hundred stuck companies staying stuck, even after the big announcement.
I find myself re-reading this number because it's the one that consistently surprises the PE and operator folks I share it with.
We want to believe a new CEO changes the picture. Usually they don't.
Which means when a CEO transition does coincide with a constraint breakout, it's a legitimately rare signal and worth paying attention to.
We had one hit the screen this week. I'm not ready to write about it yet. Next issue, maybe.
📈 One name I'm watching
Zebra Technologies (ZBRA).
Over the last two quarters the company's operating behavior has been detaching from the sector-level pattern that would normally box it in, what we'd call decoupling from the AIDC/industrial-hardware baseline.
In our historical data, names that do this have roughly a 1-in-8 chance of graduating into full platform status over the next 6–12 months.
If you're on a PE bench looking for industrial-tech platforms, ZBRA is worth a closer look before the research cycle lands.
Hmm.
— Ryan
This is my personal view. References to specific companies (Dow, ZBRA) are illustrative, based on public information and proprietary analysis. It is not investment advice. I may hold positions in companies mentioned. Do your own research before making any investment decision.
Sources
Fortune · F&L Asia · Washington Technology · Industrial Genome internal backtest (n ≈ 2,100 top-leader transitions, 960 with matched pre/post fingerprints; 659 archetype transitions in the constrained-to-resilient study).
P.S., I just released an e-book with Mike Carroll. Check it out!
